- home
- article
- U.S. President Approaches Final Decision on Iran Ceasefire Framework
U.S. President Approaches Final Decision on Iran Ceasefire Framework
Updated on
ai generated text
On Friday, May 29, President Donald Trump said he was weighing a potential agreement with Iran, while Tehran maintained that no final deal had been reached to end the Middle East conflict.
All water mines (bombs), if any, will be terminated (we have removed, through detonation, numerous such mines with our great underwater mine sweepers. Iran will complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left, which will not be many!).
Ships caught in the Strait due to our amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade, which will now be lifted, may start the process of 'heading home!' Say hello to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite president!
Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. The Hormuz Strait must be immediately open, no tolls, for unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions.
The enriched material, sometimes referred to as 'Nuclear Dust,' which is buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains, caused by our powerful B2 Bomber attack 11 months ago, sitting on top of it, will be unearthed by the United States… in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and destroyed.
No money will be exchanged, until further notice. Other items, of far less importance, have been agreed to. I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination.
Hopefully we'll continue to make progress, and the president will be in a position where he can endorse the agreement. But obviously, that's still TBD.
I do think that we've made a lot of progress here.
We're going back and forth on a couple of language points.
It's hard to say exactly when, or if, the president's going to sign the MOU.
We're going back and forth on a couple of issues on the nuclear stuff, the highly enriched stockpile, and also the question of enrichment.
We are ready to assure the world we do not seek nuclear weapons. Iran does not desire regional instability; rather, it is the Israeli regime, envisioning a 'Greater Israel,' that seeks to destabilize the region.
If they do this, it actually means stopping an illegal action that they started a few weeks ago and should never have committed in the first place.
What the Americans refer to as a naval blockade was, from the beginning, an illegal action; it was both a violation of the ceasefire and a disruption of international freedom of navigation.
We said goodbye to the language of 'must' 47 years ago. None of the Western parties, when speaking about the Islamic Republic of Iran, can use the language of 'must'. We make decisions based on the interests and rights of the Iranian people. That's one point.
Regarding the understanding ... exchanges of messages are continuing, but no final agreement has been reached yet.
Iran's solidarity with Oman in face of any threat.
The winner of any agreement is the one who is better prepared for war the day after.
We have no trust in guarantees or words, only actions are the measure. No action will be taken before the other side acts. The winner of any agreement is the one who is better prepared for war from the day after.
We seize concessions not through dialogue, but with missiles; in negotiations, we merely make them understand.
I mean, really, really low levels. You can debate whether that's going to hit those really low levels in two weeks or three weeks. But once you get to that point, then you'll see price shoot up.
Over the next few weeks, we are likely to see those pressures flow through more directly to physical prices, and there's more upward pressure that I would expect as we get into June and certainly into July.
The buffers and the shock absorbers are being steadily drawn down and the ability for the market to absorb this imbalance is drastically diminished today versus where we started.
sources
- 1.CNN
- 2.Le Monde
- 3.Hankyoreh
- 4.Yahoo Finance
- 5.Al Jazeera
- 6.Hindustan Times
- 7.The New York Times
- 8.Los Angeles Times
- 9.The Guardian
- 10.The Japan Times
- 11.Daily Sabah
- 12.The Times of India
perspectives
countries
- 1.Iran, Islamic Republic of
- 2.Israel
- 3.United States
- 4.Lebanon
- 5.Oman
- 6.Pakistan
- 7.China
- 8.Kuwait
- 9.Japan
- 10.Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
- 11.Malaysia
- 12.Qatar
organizations
- 1.Dell
- 2.Hezbollah
- 3.International Atomic Energy Agency
- 4.White House
- 5.Iranian Revolutionary Guards
- 6.Palantir
- 7.Truth Social
- 8.Hewlett-Packard
- 9.Nvidia
- 10.Republican Party
- 11.Advanced Micro Devices
- 12.Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
persons
- 1.Donald Trump
- 2.Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
- 3.James David Vance
- 4.Abbas Araqchi
- 5.Esmaeil Baqaeil
- 6.Benjamin Netanyahu
- 7.Scott Bessent
- 8.Marco Rubio
- 9.Muhammad Ishaq Dar
- 10.Bret Baier
- 11.Ebrahim Raisi
- 12.Eric Brewer