- home
- article
- Iran Expresses Lack of Trust in U.S. as Trump Tightens Peace Terms
Iran Expresses Lack of Trust in U.S. as Trump Tightens Peace Terms
Updated on
ai generated text
Iran’s chief negotiator cautioned that the United States cannot be trusted, stating that Tehran will not accept any agreement with Washington unless it fully protects Iranian rights. Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf made these remarks amid reports that President Donald Trump had returned a more stringent peace proposal to Iran.
Slowly but surely we're getting, I think, what we want and if we don't get what we want, we're going to end in a different way.
The one guarantee that I have to have is that there will be no nuclear weapons. They've agreed to that, and it was very interesting.
Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.
We've essentially defeated their military. I would rather get a deal because we can open the strait immediately upon signing. The one guarantee that I have is that there will be no nuclear weapons. They've agreed to that.
We are making a great deal; otherwise we'll just go back and finish it off militarily. We're close to a very good deal, and if we can make it good, otherwise we just start up with the Department of War.
We will not approve any agreement until we are certain that the rights of the Iranian people have been upheld.
There is no trust in the enemy's words and promises. Our only criterion is to achieve tangible results before we fulfill our commitments in return.
The Iranian minister of foreign affairs... indicated that arriving at a final agreement depended on ending the American party's attitude based on excessive demands and shifting and contradictory positions.
A major strategic setback for the United States need not affect Wall Street.
The financial markets may stabilize if it is clear that oil will eventually start flowing again through a reopened strait, even if under the new Iran-controlled system.
Then we see that he ultimately acceded to a ceasefire. We know from all the reporting coming out since that Iran's military capabilities were not reduced as much as the White House presented – something like potentially 70% of their ballistic missiles, 70-80% of the drones are intact.
Trump launched this war with these maximalist aims, very publicly stated, regime change, wanting an uprising, saying he got regime change, saying he wants to destroy their nuclear program, destroy their missile capability, their regional allies, or so-called proxies.
sources
- 1.The Straits Times
- 2.Daily Sabah
- 3.The Times of India
- 4.The New York Times
- 5.Taipei Times
- 6.CNA News
- 7.Hindustan Times
- 8.Al Jazeera
- 9.Sweden Herald
- 10.CNBC
- 11.The Guardian
- 12.Agence France-Presse
perspectives
- 1.US Foreign Policy
- 2.Israel-Palestine Conflict
- 3.British Foreign Policy
- 4.Israel under Benjamin Netanyahu
- 5.Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
- 6.Iran Foreign Policy
- 7.Oil Market
- 8.Saudi Foreign Policy
- 9.Turkish Foreign Policy
- 10.Tech industry
- 11.Yemen Houthis
- 12.Russia-Iran Ties
countries
organizations
- 1.Hezbollah
- 2.White House
- 3.Iranian Revolutionary Guards
- 4.Republican Party
- 5.Truth Social
- 6.Brookings Institution
- 7.Center for International Policy
- 8.Central Intelligence Agency
- 9.International Atomic Energy Agency
- 10.Iranian Student News Agency
- 11.Khatam Al-Anbiya Central Headquarters
- 12.NATO Defense College
persons
- 1.Donald Trump
- 2.Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
- 3.Lara Trump
- 4.Pete Hegseth
- 5.Abbas Araqchi
- 6.Ali Khamenei
- 7.Alireza Salimi
- 8.Barack Obama
- 9.Lindsay Graham
- 10.Mike Pompeo
- 11.Rahul Gandhi
- 12.Richard Weitz